ugc net june 2012 kerala court case update News
A Division Bench of the Kerala tribunal on Last Monday reserved its order on associate charm filed by the UGC against one judge’s finding quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the UGC within the National Eligibility check for lectureships. The Bench comprising magistrate Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran reserved the order once the conclusion of arguments on the appeals. The single judge decide had control that the UGC laws didn’t confer any right the UGC to repair a high mark once holding of NET. Nor such criteria can be introduced through regulation simply before the announcement of the results by govt orders. The introduction of the new criteria wasn’t supported by the law, the one decide had control. As per the new criteria, candidates within the general class WHO had scored associate mixture of sixty five per cent for all the 3 papers would be eligible to position whereas the OBC candidates want sixty per cent and also the marks for candidates within the SC/ST class was fifty five per cent.
The single judge conform had additionally declared that the petitioners WHO had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed within the UGC notification had cleared NET Exam. The court had ordered that they ought to lean the mandatory certificates in an exceedingly month. In its charm, the UGC contended that the tribunal had no right to create a declaration relating to the results of the check. It had been clearly explicit within the original notification that candidates ought to acquire the minimum needed marks in every paper individually.
It had additionally been same that the qualifying criteria for Junior analysis Fellowship and eligibility for position would be determined by the UGC before the declaration of results. It was the self-control board selected by the UGC comprising senior academicians WHO had counseled that the overall, OBC (non-creamy layer) and also the SC/ST candidates would be needed to get associate mixture proportion of sixty five, sixty and fifty five severally additionally to the paper-wise minimum proportion as qualifying criteria. The notification had clearly same that the ultimate cut-off shall be determined by the commission before the declaration of results. the judge’s ruling would only have an effect on the quality of education.