Fighters against the injustice of UGC NET June 2012 News

By | March 21, 2013

The injustice of UGC NET June 2012 against Fighters News

UGC NET Results or CSIR or JRF Results

NET/JRF Rsults or CSIR-UGC December 2012 Results PDF

UGC-NET 2013_library seva

The vital issue to notice is that information superhighway had objectiveness inbuilt to its analysis even before the June 2012 internet communication. Before the UGC can valuate solely the target papers of Paper one and Paper two to choose the result. The non objective Paper three are going to be evaluated just for people who have cleared Paper one and Paper two. thus it’s wrong for the Committee to own deliberated on dynamic the pattern of the communication Associate in Nursingd therefore to own modified the pattern of Paper three from the sooner pattern that has been determined by an knowledgeable committee. The employers had the texture of the candidates skillfulness to careful answers within the earlier pattern that’s necessary in Humanities subjects. The Paper two and Paper three square measure completely different in CSIR, tho’ each could also be objective. however that’s not the case with June 2012 internet communication pattern. there’s a powerful reason to believe that this alteration has been done to impact bound malpractices. the simplest answer now could be to utterly declare the June 2012 and Gregorian calendar month 2012 examinations as ‘sub standard’ and to discard these results. Let the UGC conduct the examination within the previous pattern once more to those aspirants while not taking any application fee

The right answer to the current debacle is feasible on condition that the UGC is pressurised to scrap the June 2012 and Dec 2012 examination. after all there’ll positively be plenty of broken hearts. however the decision of Kerala judicature isn’t a comprehensive one then are going to be stoutly resisted by UGC by all suggests that. If the Judgement of Kerala HC is formed applicable to non petitioners then the pass proportion are going to be touching eightieth which is many lakhs of candidates. {that can|which will|that may} dilute the worth of UGC and therefore will build it straightforward for information superhighway review committee to scrap all information superhighway theme. other than {it can|it’ll} be a Court continuing and now the UGC will say, “UGC has been permissible earlier by Court to dump MPhil and Ph.D.. Then why not internet and SET?”

June 2012 Associate in Nursingd Dec 2012 internet examination is an aberration then the Court ought to even be given a choice to scrap it with due penalties to UGC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *